Skip to content
Female ejaculation, commonly known as "squirting," has been a subject of fascination and debate for centuries. While some argue that it is merely diluted urine, others claim that it is a distinct sexual fluid with unique characteristics.
In this blog, we are going to dig deeper into the scientific studies and research around a Vulva Owner, aiming to demystify the misconceptions and provide clarity on the nature of squirt.
Clearing the Waters
At a glance, squirt is described as clear, odorless, tasteless, and containing PSA (female ejaculate), while urine is characterized by its yellow color, unpleasant odor, horrible taste, and the absence of PSA. The key distinction lies in their chemical composition, with squirt being over 99% water and containing insignificant trace urine chemicals, while urine can range from almost 90% water to nearly 10% urine chemicals.
The Research Divide
The debate often revolves around studies that claim Vulva Owner ejaculation is chemically identical to urine. However, conflicting research findings add complexity to the discussion. Studies by Addiego and Schubach reveal significant reductions in urine chemicals during female ejaculation, supporting the notion that squirt is distinct from urine.
Schubach's study, in particular, showed that Vulva Owners who experienced squirting had massive reductions in urine chemicals, such as an 86% reduction in urea and an 89% reduction in creatine. This suggests that true squirt is primarily water, with only trace amounts of urine chemicals, making it virtually indistinguishable from natural water.
Hydration and Squirt
The level of hydration plays a crucial role in understanding the nature of squirt. Even if they were to hydrate significantly and then experience arousal leading to ejaculation, the resulting fluid would likely be even purer, with higher water content and almost negligible urine chemicals. This emphasises that true squirt is a unique fluid produced during sexual arousal and orgasm.
Technicality vs. Reality
While some studies technically label squirt as "diluted urine," this terminology can be misleading when examined from a practical standpoint. In everyday language, referring to a fluid that is over 99% water with trace urine chemicals as "urine" doesn't align with the sensory experience or consequences associated with traditional urine.In the end, the trolls insisting that "squirt is pee" might want to reconsider their stance. Applying their flawed logic would mean calling tap water "pee" as well. The studies and research presented in this article make it clear that squirt is a remarkable and unique phenomenon, closer to tap water than urine.